I've got several post processors for fusion and the T series.... there is a problem, though.
Fusions cloud based subscription pushes updates that can and do impact operations of your machine. It's incredibly frustrating. Vetrics has done it too, but at least you can roll them back until an adjustment is presented.
Their release notes (by they I mean both) are not complete... as a for instance fusion used g54 as a default offset, which is fine and if you didn't select an offset... then in an update they flipped it to g53... that is a big deal- that's mechanical coordinates vs user defined coordinates and will cause huge issues with crashing. Vetrics once implemented a change with tool names- and if your processor didn't specify ignoring curly brackets in a tool name your file would stop being processed by the machine.... both did this out of the blue- but that's the only time I've seen vetrics do something like that. Fusion does it constantly.
If you can drive fusion, then you know it's several orders of magnitude more powerful than vetrics, yet vetrics can perform 98% of what most 3 or 4 axis users need.
I dont mind sharing the fusion posts with you, but understand I've no affiliation with phantom and you'll be carrying a risk running it I won't guarantee in any way.... and for the same reason phantom wont- because it can change and cause serious issues.
I really wish fusion was available without that dumb cloud and subscriptions.
